Mitchell Baum
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Bioenergy crop production and management
- Soil Science top 10%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Crop Yield and Soil Fertility 8
- Bioenergy crop production and management 3
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 5
- Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement 2
- Plant responses to elevated CO2 1
- Co-authors
- Sotirios V. Archontoulis (11 shared papers)Mark A. Licht (4 shared papers)Isaiah Huber (3 shared papers)Michael J. Castellano (7 shared papers)John E. Sawyer (3 shared papers)Matthew J. Helmers (3 shared papers)Virginia Nichols (1 shared paper)E. J. Kladivko (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Agronomy Journal (3 papers)Field Crops Research (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)European Journal of Agronomy (1 paper)Soil Science Society of America Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaArgentina
In The Last Decade
Mitchell Baum
11 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Agronomy and Crop Science 205
- Soil Science 67
- Plant Science 217
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 90
- Environmental Chemistry 18
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Baum. The network helps show where Mitchell Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 89 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 82 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 0 |
About Mitchell Baum
Mitchell Baum is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Soil Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (8 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (2 papers), Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (2 papers) and Plant responses to elevated CO2 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (205 citations), Soil Science (67 citations), Plant Science (217 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (90 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (18 citations). Mitchell Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Sotirios V. Archontoulis, Mark A. Licht, Isaiah Huber, Michael J. Castellano, John E. Sawyer, Matthew J. Helmers, Virginia Nichols, E. J. Kladivko, Emerson D. Nafziger and Heather Pasley. Their work appears in journals such as Agronomy Journal, Field Crops Research, Nature Communications, European Journal of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.