Mitchell B. Locke
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Neurological disorders and treatments
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Motor Control and Adaptation
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Papers in
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 8
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 3
- Neurological disorders and treatments 2
-
- Motor Control and Adaptation 3
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 1
- Co-authors
- Aimee J. Nelson (9 shared papers)Claudia V. Turco (9 shared papers)Jenin El‐Sayes (6 shared papers)Diana Harasym (2 shared papers)Hunter J. Fassett (2 shared papers)Robert Chen (1 shared paper)Steven K. Baker (1 shared paper)Mark Tommerdahl (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Physiology (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)The Neuroscientist (1 paper)Brain stimulation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mitchell B. Locke
9 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Neurology 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 139
- Rehabilitation 40
- Psychiatry and Mental health 46
- Neurology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell B. Locke
This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell B. Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell B. Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell B. Locke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell B. Locke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell B. Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell B. Locke. The network helps show where Mitchell B. Locke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Mitchell B. Locke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 214 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 2 |
About Mitchell B. Locke
Mitchell B. Locke is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (8 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (166 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (139 citations), Rehabilitation (40 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (46 citations) and Neurology (38 citations). Mitchell B. Locke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aimee J. Nelson, Claudia V. Turco, Jenin El‐Sayes, Diana Harasym, Hunter J. Fassett, Robert Chen, Steven K. Baker, Mark Tommerdahl, Lauren E. Skelly and Martin J. Gibala. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Brain Research, PLoS ONE, The Neuroscientist and Brain stimulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.