Minting Li

2.5k citations
117 papers · 2.1k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Minting Li

109 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Minting Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Water Science and Technology 879
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.4k
  • Waste Management and Disposal 191
  • Inorganic Chemistry 248
Replace Cunxiong Li with:
Cunxiong Li China
Leming Ou China
Wensheng Zhang Australia
Mahmoud Abdollahy Iran
Haisheng Han China
Corby Anderson United States
Myong Jun Kim South Korea
Inna V. Filippova France
Minting Li relative to Cunxiong Li China Cunxiong Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Cunxiong Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Minting Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minting Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minting Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minting Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minting Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minting Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minting Li. The network helps show where Minting Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Minting Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Minting Li Line = papers co-authored together Minting Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010141
2 2010113
3 200996
4 201086
5 201078
6 201174
7 201271
8 200971
9 201065
10 201563
11 201060
12 201458
13 201645
14 202139
15 201039
16 201438
17 201036
18 202236
19 201035
20 202134

About Minting Li

Minting Li is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Chemistry and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 117 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (82 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (63 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (60 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (14 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (8 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (6 papers), Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition (6 papers) and Iron oxide chemistry and applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (879 citations), Mechanical Engineering (1.4k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.4k citations), Waste Management and Disposal (191 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (248 citations). Minting Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Chang Wei, Zhigan Deng, Cunxiong Li, Xingbin Li, Gang Fan, Xingbin Li, Hongsheng Xu, Xuejiao Zhou, Shuang Qiu and Wei Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrometallurgy, Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly, JOM, Separation and Purification Technology and International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact