Min‐Shao Tsai

413 citations
11 papers · 337 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 4
    • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 2
    • Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes 2
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 2

Min‐Shao Tsai

11 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Min‐Shao Tsai
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Toxicology 47
  • Molecular Medicine 50
  • Oncology 91
  • Molecular Biology 224
  • Pharmacology 28
Replace Shao‐Hsing Weng with:
Shao‐Hsing Weng Taiwan
Shreya Kar Singapore
Liuning Li China
Huaxin Hou China
Ying-Jhen Su Taiwan
Lakshmishri Lahiry India
Prabodh K. Kandala United States
MyongHak Ri China
Lingdi Ma China
Adeel Ga Chaudhary Saudi Arabia
Min‐Shao Tsai relative to Shao‐Hsing Weng Taiwan Shao‐Hsing Weng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Shao‐Hsing Weng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min‐Shao Tsai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min‐Shao Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min‐Shao Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min‐Shao Tsai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min‐Shao Tsai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min‐Shao Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min‐Shao Tsai. The network helps show where Min‐Shao Tsai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Min‐Shao Tsai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min‐Shao Tsai Line = papers co-authored together Min‐Shao Tsai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201063
2 200946
3 201139
4 200934
5 201131
6 201131
7 201023
8 201220
9 202019
10 201118
11 201113

About Min‐Shao Tsai

Min‐Shao Tsai is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Plant Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Toxicology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (2 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (47 citations), Molecular Medicine (50 citations), Oncology (91 citations), Molecular Biology (224 citations) and Pharmacology (28 citations). Min‐Shao Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Yun‐Wei Lin, Shao‐Hsing Weng, Jen‐Chung Ko, Szu‐Ting Lin, Chao‐Min Cheng, Ying-Jhen Su, Yu‐Ching Huang, Shih‐Ci Ciou, Lee‐Young Chau and Yen‐Hui Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Pharmacology, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Lung Cancer and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact