Ming-Ping Wu

678 citations
24 papers · 519 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Ping Wu

24 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Ming-Ping Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Urology 88
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 76
  • Rheumatology 83
  • Surgery 207
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 7
Replace Vassilios Tzortzis with:
Vassilios Tzortzis Greece
Mehmet Kaynar Türkiye
Fatih Tarhan Türkiye
Joseph Y. Clark United States
Behnam Shakiba Iran
Giorgio Mazzon Italy
Graham Hollins United Kingdom
Chii‐Jye Wang Taiwan
Emanuele Rubilotta Italy
Francisco J. Orejuela United States
Ming-Ping Wu relative to Vassilios Tzortzis Greece Vassilios Tzortzis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vassilios Tzortzis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Ping Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Ping Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Ping Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Ping Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Ping Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Ping Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Ping Wu. The network helps show where Ming-Ping Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Ping Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Ping Wu Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Ping Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000140
2 201862
3 201556
4 200428
5 200727
6 201220
7 201219
8 201417
9 201217
10 200416
11 201815
12 200415
13 201415
14 201310
15 201310
16 20209
17 20189
18 20028
19 20148
20 20217

About Ming-Ping Wu

Ming-Ping Wu is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urology, Rheumatology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 24 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (3 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (3 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (3 papers) and Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (88 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (76 citations), Rheumatology (83 citations), Surgery (207 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (7 citations). Ming-Ping Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ron Rowbotham, Chau-Su Ou, Charles Lung-Cheng Huang, Chung‐Han Ho, Shih‐Feng Weng, Ya-Wen Hsu, Yao‐Chi Chuang, Li‐Wha Wu, Kuo-Feng Huang and Cheng-Yang Chou. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Platelets, Scientific Reports, Journal of Endourology and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact