Ming-Kun Lu

453 citations
16 papers · 352 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Kun Lu

16 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Ming-Kun Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Emergency Medical Services 87
  • Clinical Psychology 150
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Food Science 51
  • Occupational Therapy 9
Replace Catherine John with:
Catherine John United Kingdom
Shari Hrabovsky United States
Minji Kang South Korea
Ahmad Nasiri Iran
Marcela Salazar–García Mexico
Ayşe Özkaraman Türkiye
C. Otto United States
Yingli Fu China
Ming-Kun Lu relative to Catherine John United Kingdom Catherine John's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Catherine John · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Kun Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Kun Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Kun Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Kun Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Kun Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Kun Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Kun Lu. The network helps show where Ming-Kun Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Kun Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Kun Lu Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Kun Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201081
2 200478
3 200350
4
Survey of psychiatric disorders in a Taiwanese village population six months after a major earthquake.
200540
5 200720
6 201619
7 201019
8 201913
9 200410
10 20166
11 20225
12 20244
13 20223
14 20242
15 20101
16 20241

About Ming-Kun Lu

Ming-Kun Lu is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medical Services, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (1 paper) and Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (87 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Food Science (51 citations) and Occupational Therapy (9 citations). Ming-Kun Lu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frank Huang‐Chih Chou, Tom Su, I‐Chia Chien, Wen‐Chen Ouyang, Pesus Chou, Yuan‐Wei Shih, Pin-Shern Chen, M. Huang, Pesus Chou and Sheng‐Hsiang Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Materials Horizons, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact