Ming‐Kuem Lin

967 citations
42 papers · 743 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities 3
    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 3
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 6

Ming‐Kuem Lin

40 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers

Ming‐Kuem Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Plant Science 324
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 62
  • Endocrinology 38
  • Pharmacology 58
  • Animal Science and Zoology 58
Replace Yue Liang with:
Yue Liang China
Sezer Okay Türkiye
Lili He China
Sameer S. Bhagyawant India
Marsen Garcia Pinto Coelho Brazil
Xueqing Ma China
Bomin Kim South Korea
Hongyu Xiang China
Roberta Pereira Miranda Fernandes Brazil
Elham Awad Egypt
Ming‐Kuem Lin relative to Yue Liang China Yue Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Yue Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Kuem Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Kuem Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Kuem Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Kuem Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Kuem Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Kuem Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Kuem Lin. The network helps show where Ming‐Kuem Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Kuem Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Kuem Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Kuem Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200475
2 201459
3 200647
4 201142
5 201141
6 201539
7 201335
8 201933
9 201832
10 201531
11 201127
12 201325
13 201824
14 201623
15 201619
16 202218
17 202014
18 200713
19 201312
20 201712

About Ming‐Kuem Lin

Ming‐Kuem Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Animal Science and Zoology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 42 papers that have together received 743 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (6 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (5 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (4 papers), Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (3 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (3 papers) and Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (324 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (62 citations), Endocrinology (38 citations), Pharmacology (58 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (58 citations). Ming‐Kuem Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Netherlands and China. Frequent co-authors include Meng‐Shiou Lee, Wen-Te Chang, Yau‐Heiu Hsu, Na‐Sheng Lin, Ban‐Yang Chang, Guan‐Hua Lai, Hui‐Chi Huang, Jia-Teh Liao, You‐Cheng Hseu and Wen‐Huang Peng. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Molecules, BMC Veterinary Research, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology and Planta Medica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact