Ming-Jay Deng

14 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Ming-Jay Deng
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Catalysis 294
  • Electrochemistry 191
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 474
  • Polymers and Plastics 170
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 565
Replace Alessandra Fernicola with:
Alessandra Fernicola Italy
Gaurav M. Thorat South Korea
Tristan J. Simons Australia
Agnieszka Swiderska‐Mocek Poland
Masahiro Yanagida Japan
Yuichi Mita Japan
Jakub Reiter Czechia
Michiyuki Kono Japan
Alex Ryan Neale United Kingdom
Eneko Azaceta Spain
Ming-Jay Deng relative to Alessandra Fernicola Italy Alessandra Fernicola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Alessandra Fernicola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Jay Deng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Jay Deng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Jay Deng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Jay Deng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Jay Deng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Jay Deng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Jay Deng. The network helps show where Ming-Jay Deng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Jay Deng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Jay Deng Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Jay Deng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2007149
2 2009148
3 201197
4 200871
5 200867
6 201162
7 200958
8 201645
9 200841
10 201540
11 200938
12 200825
13 201023
14 202010

About Ming-Jay Deng

Ming-Jay Deng is a scholar working on Catalysis, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Polymers and Plastics, Electrochemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (8 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (6 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (6 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (4 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (3 papers), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (2 papers), Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (2 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (294 citations), Electrochemistry (191 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (474 citations), Polymers and Plastics (170 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (565 citations). Ming-Jay Deng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Jeng‐Kuei Chang, I‐Wen Sun, Wen‐Ta Tsai, Po‐Yu Chen, Jin‐Ming Chen, Kueih‐Tzu Lu, Wen-Ta Tsai, Ming‐Tsung Lee, Chih-Ming Lin and Mau‐Tsu Tang. Their work appears in journals such as Electrochimica Acta, Nanotechnology, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact