Ming-Feng Tu
Impact in
- Structural Biology top 10%
- Radiation top 10%
- X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
- Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Papers in
-
- X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis 2
- Nuclear Physics and Applications 1
-
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies 2
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 1
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 1
- Co-authors
- Anne Marie March (2 shared papers)André Al Haddad (2 shared papers)Gilles Doumy (2 shared papers)Yoshiaki Kumagai (2 shared papers)Michele Puppin (1 shared paper)Grigory Yu. Smolentsev (1 shared paper)Thomas Rossi (1 shared paper)Franziska Krieg (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Science (1 paper)Review of Scientific Instruments (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)The Journal of Chemical Physics (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySweden
In The Last Decade
Ming-Feng Tu
6 papers receiving 334 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Structural Biology 18
- Radiation 61
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 45
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 142
- Electrochemistry 17
Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Feng Tu
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Feng Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Feng Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Feng Tu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Feng Tu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Feng Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Feng Tu. The network helps show where Ming-Feng Tu may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Feng Tu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 219 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 4 |
About Ming-Feng Tu
Ming-Feng Tu is a scholar working on Radiation, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Inorganic Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (1 paper), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (1 paper), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (1 paper), Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms (1 paper) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (18 citations), Radiation (61 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (45 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (142 citations) and Electrochemistry (17 citations). Ming-Feng Tu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Anne Marie March, André Al Haddad, Gilles Doumy, Yoshiaki Kumagai, Michele Puppin, Grigory Yu. Smolentsev, Thomas Rossi, Franziska Krieg, Simon Christian Boehme and Giulia F. Mancini. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Review of Scientific Instruments, Chemical Communications, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.