Ming-Fa Lin

419 citations
27 papers · 314 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Fa Lin

21 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Ming-Fa Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Materials Chemistry 274
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 147
  • Biomedical Engineering 85
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 93
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 16
Replace A. A. Shylau with:
A. A. Shylau Sweden
R.B. Chen Taiwan
Gabriella D. Shepard United States
Jyotsna Chauhan United States
Wengang Lu China
Seunghoon Yang South Korea
Chiun‐Yan Lin Taiwan
Thi-Nga Do Taiwan
Demetrio Logoteta Italy
Shiru Song China
Ming-Fa Lin relative to A. A. Shylau Sweden A. A. Shylau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. A. Shylau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Fa Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Fa Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Fa Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Fa Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Fa Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Fa Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Fa Lin. The network helps show where Ming-Fa Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Fa Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Fa Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Fa Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006176
2 200031
3 200128
4 201315
5 201211
6 20169
7 19998
8 20106
9 19975
10 20174
11 20103
12 20133
13 20213
14 20212
15 20192
16 20192
17 19992
18 20241
19 20221
20 20211

About Ming-Fa Lin

Ming-Fa Lin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry, having authored 27 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (13 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (8 papers), Advancements in Battery Materials (7 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (5 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (2 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (2 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (1 paper) and Advanced Battery Technologies Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (274 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (147 citations), Biomedical Engineering (85 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (93 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (16 citations). Ming-Fa Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Vietnam and Yemen. Frequent co-authors include R.B. Chen, Ching-Chih Chang, Chin‐Li Lu, Y. C. Huang, Feng-Lin Shyu, S.-I. Liu, Chih‐Wei Chiu, Shih‐Yang Lin, Yuan‐Cheng Huang and Ngoc Thanh Thuy Tran. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Carbon and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact