Ming‐De Chen

30 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

Ming‐De Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Rehabilitation 238
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 64
  • Physiology 233
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 112
  • Occupational Therapy 40
Replace Laurie A. Malone with:
Laurie A. Malone United States
Cherry Kilbride United Kingdom
Byron W. Lai United States
Hilda F. Mulligan New Zealand
Thamar J. H. Bovend’Eerdt Netherlands
Ardalan Shariat Iran
Yumi Kim United States
Błażej Cieślik Poland
Marta Pérez‐de‐Heredia‐Torres Spain
Karen Huhn United States
Ming‐De Chen relative to Laurie A. Malone United States Laurie A. Malone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Laurie A. Malone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐De Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐De Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐De Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐De Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐De Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐De Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐De Chen. The network helps show where Ming‐De Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐De Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐De Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐De Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010138
2 2011116
3 2016111
4 2011103
5 201199
6 201671
7 201368
8 201266
9 201639
10 201529
11 201828
12 201523
13 201617
14 201316
15 202215
16 201313
17 201613
18 201612
19 201712
20 201710

About Ming‐De Chen

Ming‐De Chen is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (2 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper) and Sleep and related disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (238 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (64 citations), Physiology (233 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (112 citations) and Occupational Therapy (40 citations). Ming‐De Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include James Howard Rimmer, Kelly Hsieh, Charles E. Drum, Jeffrey A. McCubbin, Jana J. Peterson, Keh‐chung Lin, Ching‐Yi Wu, Chieh-ling Yang, Jer‐Hao Chang and Chung-Ying Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, BioMed Research International and Mental health and physical activity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact