Ming-Cheng Wei

449 citations
6 papers · 382 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 4
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 3
    • Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications 2
    • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery 3

Ming-Cheng Wei

6 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Ming-Cheng Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Biomaterials 123
  • Pharmaceutical Science 52
  • Molecular Biology 254
  • Polymers and Plastics 45
  • Molecular Medicine 13
Replace Zi-Xian Liao with:
Zi-Xian Liao Taiwan
Nathaly Segovia Spain
Srikanth Sriadibhatla United States
Jaydev R. Upponi United States
Darío Manzanares Spain
Marcin Wojnilowicz Australia
Pramod Kumar Ek Denmark
Sangeun Lee Germany
Angela Alexander-Bryant United States
Jung-hua Steven Kuo Taiwan
Ming-Cheng Wei relative to Zi-Xian Liao Taiwan Zi-Xian Liao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zi-Xian Liao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Cheng Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Cheng Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Cheng Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Cheng Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Cheng Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Cheng Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Cheng Wei. The network helps show where Ming-Cheng Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Cheng Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Cheng Wei Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Cheng Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2010151
2 200897
3 201058
4 201557
5 201518
6 20231

About Ming-Cheng Wei

Ming-Cheng Wei is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Oncology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (3 papers), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (1 paper), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper), Galectins and Cancer Biology (1 paper) and Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (123 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (52 citations), Molecular Biology (254 citations), Polymers and Plastics (45 citations) and Molecular Medicine (13 citations). Ming-Cheng Wei has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Hsing‐Wen Sung, Shu‐Fen Peng, Zi-Xian Liao, Michael T. Tseng, Yi‐Cheng Ho, Hsin‐Lung Chen, Chun‐Jen Su, Chun‐Yu Chen, Maggie Lu and Qing Ye. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Cancer Biology & Therapy, Scientific Reports and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact