Ming-Cheng Chan

1.5k citations
47 papers · 948 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ming-Cheng Chan

43 papers receiving 939 citations

Peers

Ming-Cheng Chan
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 130
  • Molecular Medicine 84
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 381
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 21
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 41
Replace Shinn‐Jye Liang with:
Shinn‐Jye Liang Taiwan
Nicolas Nesseler France
Jianguo Li China
M. A. Weigand Germany
Raffaele De Gaudio Italy
Cosimo Chelazzi Italy
Waldemar Goździk Poland
J.A. Barker United Kingdom
Fernando Ríos Argentina
Ronald J. Manning United States
Ming-Cheng Chan relative to Shinn‐Jye Liang Taiwan Shinn‐Jye Liang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Shinn‐Jye Liang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming-Cheng Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming-Cheng Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming-Cheng Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming-Cheng Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming-Cheng Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming-Cheng Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming-Cheng Chan. The network helps show where Ming-Cheng Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming-Cheng Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming-Cheng Chan Line = papers co-authored together Ming-Cheng Chan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014187
2 201173
3 201567
4 200766
5 200951
6 201851
7 202031
8 200830
9 202130
10 202129
11 200727
12 201827
13 202223
14 200622
15 201821
16 202218
17 202316
18 202214
19 202214
20 200913

About Ming-Cheng Chan

Ming-Cheng Chan is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Molecular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (10 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (5 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers), Inflammation biomarkers and pathways (2 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (130 citations), Molecular Medicine (84 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (381 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (21 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (41 citations). Ming-Cheng Chan has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chieh‐Liang Wu, Wen‐Cheng Chao, Jeng‐Yuan Hsu, Benjamin Ing-Tiau Kuo, Hao‐Chien Wang, Kuang‐Yao Yang, Chau‐Chyun Sheu, Ching‐Hsiung Lin, Shih-Lung Cheng and Arthur S. Slutsky. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Medicine, Respirology, International Journal of COPD, Scientific Reports and Respiratory Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact