Ming‐Che Tsai

42 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Ming‐Che Tsai
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Emergency Medical Services 240
  • Emergency Medicine 131
  • Biophysics 66
  • Physiology 162
  • Ophthalmology 51
Replace Bradley E. Smith with:
Bradley E. Smith United States
Mark J. Rice United States
David B. Konrad Germany
Paul Leonard United Kingdom
Michael D. Wirt United States
Rajeev Kumar India
Christopher Allen United Kingdom
D. Kevin Horton United States
Wei Fu China
Haifang Li China
Ming‐Che Tsai relative to Bradley E. Smith United States Bradley E. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.8×
Bradley E. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Che Tsai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Che Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Che Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Che Tsai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Che Tsai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Che Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Che Tsai. The network helps show where Ming‐Che Tsai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Che Tsai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Che Tsai Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Che Tsai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004114
2 2005113
3 200672
4 200367
5 200964
6 200361
7 200438
8 200738
9 200138
10 200533
11 201630
12 201427
13 200823
14 202120
15 201017
16 201416
17 201411
18 201210
19 20199
20 20109

About Ming‐Che Tsai

Ming‐Che Tsai is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 44 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disaster Response and Management (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (2 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (240 citations), Emergency Medicine (131 citations), Biophysics (66 citations), Physiology (162 citations) and Ophthalmology (51 citations). Ming‐Che Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Arnold, Pinchas Halpern, Wen‐Feng Liaw, Howard Smithline, Fu‐Te Tsai, Gürkan Ersoy, M.-H. Tsai, Gene‐Hsiang Lee, Ming‐Hsi Chiang and Hsiao‐Wen Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Academic Emergency Medicine, Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of Dental Sciences and Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact