Ming Sing

508 citations
33 papers · 342 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Sing

27 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Ming Sing
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Political Science and International Relations 161
  • Sociology and Political Science 258
  • Public Administration 19
  • Health 27
  • Development 10
Replace Francis O’Connor with:
Francis O’Connor Germany
Zsófia S. Ignácz Germany
Patrick L. Lown United Kingdom
Gary M. Reich United States
Tanja Dannwolf Germany
Conrad Ziller Germany
Chagai Weiss United States
Eugene Walton United States
Elizabeth A. Oldmixon United States
Luis Bouza García Spain
Ming Sing relative to Francis O’Connor Germany Francis O’Connor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Francis O’Connor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Sing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Sing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Sing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Sing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Sing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Sing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Sing. The network helps show where Ming Sing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Ming Sing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Sing Line = papers co-authored together Ming Sing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202031
2 200431
3 200830
4 201030
5 201328
6
Hong Kong's Tortuous Democratization: A Comparative Analysis
200425
7 200624
8 200921
9 201021
10
Happiness Across Cultures: Views of Happiness and Quality of Life in Non-Western Cultures
201116
11 200510
12 19969
13 20207
14 20007
15 20017
16 20086
17 19966
18 20126
19 20045
20 19964

About Ming Sing

Ming Sing is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (23 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers) and Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (161 citations), Sociology and Political Science (258 citations), Public Administration (19 citations), Health (27 citations) and Development (10 citations). Ming Sing has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony B. L. Cheung. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary Asia, Democratization, International Journal of Public Administration, Communist and Post-Communist Studies and The China Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact