Ming Lee

68 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Ming Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 133
  • Family Practice 36
  • Infectious Diseases 280
  • Virology 52
  • Genetics 104
Replace Peter Joseph Jongen with:
Peter Joseph Jongen Netherlands
Amy Bronstone United States
Martin B. Marx United States
Raymond Voltz Germany
David M. Lubaroff United States
Alain Diaz United States
Michael Scanlon United States
John B. Winfield United States
Staci Martin United States
Najib Aziz United States
Ming Lee relative to Peter Joseph Jongen Netherlands Peter Joseph Jongen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Peter Joseph Jongen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Lee. The network helps show where Ming Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Lee Line = papers co-authored together Ming Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997272
2 1998204
3 2016186
4 2011139
5 2009130
6 2018109
7 201287
8 201677
9 200348
10 201846
11 201646
12 201443
13 202040
14 200831
15 202030
16 201626
17 201823
18 200422
19 201721
20 201221

About Ming Lee

Ming Lee is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Virology and Surgery, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (11 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (5 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (133 citations), Family Practice (36 citations), Infectious Diseases (280 citations), Virology (52 citations) and Genetics (104 citations). Ming Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Mary‐Claire King, Patrick J. O’Connor, Dane B. Cook, Tom Walsh, Mark Pakianathan, Aseel Hegazi, Bavithra Nathan, William Whittaker, Alex S. Nord and LuAnn Wilkerson. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, Academic Medicine, International Journal of STD & AIDS, Genomics and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact