Ming Ding

4.1k citations
169 papers · 3.2k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Ming Ding

159 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Ming Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.7k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2.0k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 429
  • Bioengineering 78
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 11
Replace Víctor M. Acosta with:
Víctor M. Acosta United States
Akiko Kumada Japan
Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini Canada
Feng Li China
Qian Li China
K. T. Mathew India
Kunihiko Hidaka Japan
Thomas Christen Switzerland
Shahid Rauf United States
Ming Ding relative to Víctor M. Acosta United States Víctor M. Acosta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Víctor M. Acosta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Ding. The network helps show where Ming Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Ding Line = papers co-authored together Ming Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011248
2 2013125
3 2012110
4 202491
5 201187
6 202181
7 201579
8 201878
9 201177
10 201377
11 201269
12 201263
13 201960
14 202160
15 201959
16 201559
17 201656
18 201253
19 201150
20 201950

About Ming Ding

Ming Ding is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Algebra and Number Theory and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 169 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (59 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (57 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (38 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (24 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (21 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (14 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.7k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2.0k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (429 citations), Bioengineering (78 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (11 citations). Ming Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gilberto Brambilla, Pengfei Wang, Gerald Farrell, Yuliya Semenova, Qiang Wu, Yiheng Yin, Jiancheng Fang, Jixi Lu, Timothy Lee and Bangcheng Han. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express, IEEE Sensors Journal, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement and Journal of Lightwave Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact