Miles Day

954 citations
30 papers · 537 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 9
    • Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments 7
    • Anesthesia and Pain Management 6
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 3

Miles Day

27 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Miles Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 126
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 152
  • Pharmacology 109
  • Physiology 141
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 59
Replace Nathan J. Koewler with:
Nathan J. Koewler United States
Ann‐Kristin Reinhold Germany
Shengjun Sun China
David F. Moorhouse United States
Kunihiro Nakai Japan
Bo Johansson Sweden
Erin Yamamoto United States
Monica Herrera United States
Paul Hardy United Kingdom
Torge Rempe United States
Miles Day relative to Nathan J. Koewler United States Nathan J. Koewler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nathan J. Koewler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miles Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles Day. The network helps show where Miles Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miles Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miles Day Line = papers co-authored together Miles Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008131
2 200980
3 200877
4 200348
5 200934
6 199925
7 200124
8 200220
9 200316
10 200011
11 199910
12 20239
13 19938
14 20106
15 20086
16 20234
17 20254
18 20124
19 20204
20 20044

About Miles Day

Miles Day is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pharmacology, Physiology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (9 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (5 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (126 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (152 citations), Pharmacology (109 citations), Physiology (141 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations). Miles Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James E. Heavner, Jason A. Williams, Gabor B. Racz, Jan Van Zundert, Nagy Mekhail, Maarten van Kleef, Leland Lou, Prithvi Raj, Mary Baker and Michael E Schatman. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Practice, Journal of Pain Research, Pain Physician, The Anatomical Record and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact