Miklós Bodor

545 citations
36 papers · 347 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Miklós Bodor

31 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Miklós Bodor
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 141
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 46
  • Oncology 64
  • Pharmacology 21
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 33
Replace Clara García-Carro with:
Clara García-Carro Spain
Komuraiah Myakala United States
Conxita Jacobs-Cachá Spain
Shuo Feng China
Muammer Kara Türkiye
Abdullah Sonsuz Türkiye
Süleyman Hilmi İpekçi Türkiye
Tomislav Bulum Croatia
Muhammad Nasir Pakistan
Masanori Furukawa Japan
Miklós Bodor relative to Clara García-Carro Spain Clara García-Carro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Clara García-Carro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miklós Bodor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miklós Bodor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miklós Bodor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miklós Bodor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miklós Bodor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miklós Bodor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miklós Bodor. The network helps show where Miklós Bodor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Miklós Bodor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miklós Bodor Line = papers co-authored together Miklós Bodor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201995
2 200576
3 201420
4 201718
5 200915
6 202212
7 201012
8 202210
9 202010
10 20149
11 20218
12 20218
13 20127
14 20236
15 20215
16 20224
17 20254
18 20114
19 20043
20 20243

About Miklós Bodor

Miklós Bodor is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (8 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (4 papers), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (3 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers) and Advanced Differential Geometry Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (141 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (46 citations), Oncology (64 citations), Pharmacology (21 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (33 citations). Miklós Bodor has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Rodney J. Y. Ho, Endre V. Nagy, Eszter Berta, Annamária Erdei, Mariann Harangi, Miklós Zrı́nyi, Dénes Páll, György Paragh, Ferenc Győry and Mónika Katkó. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Endocrinology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Atherosclerosis, Genes and European Thyroid Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact