Mikhail Eugene Kandel

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mikhail Eugene Kandel
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 882
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 33
  • Biophysics 188
  • Biomedical Engineering 228
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 89
Replace Pierre Bon with:
Pierre Bon France
Jonghee W. Yoon South Korea
Peng Fei China
Bruce Zhi Gao United States
Coleman Murray United States
Lingjie Kong China
Julien Savatier France
Nicolas Pavillon Switzerland
İkbal Şencan United States
Francesco Merola Italy
Mikhail Eugene Kandel relative to Pierre Bon France Pierre Bon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Pierre Bon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mikhail Eugene Kandel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mikhail Eugene Kandel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mikhail Eugene Kandel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mikhail Eugene Kandel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mikhail Eugene Kandel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mikhail Eugene Kandel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mikhail Eugene Kandel. The network helps show where Mikhail Eugene Kandel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mikhail Eugene Kandel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mikhail Eugene Kandel Line = papers co-authored together Mikhail Eugene Kandel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017210
2 2017140
3 202080
4 201971
5 201966
6 202164
7 202346
8 201545
9 201643
10 201743
11 201642
12 201742
13 202039
14 201838
15 201838
16 201737
17 202037
18 201736
19 201635
20 201735

About Mikhail Eugene Kandel

Mikhail Eugene Kandel is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Cell Biology, Biophysics and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Holography and Microscopy (42 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (6 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (2 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers) and Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (882 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (33 citations), Biophysics (188 citations), Biomedical Engineering (228 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (89 citations). Mikhail Eugene Kandel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Gabriel Popescu, Tan Huu Nguyen, M. Rubessa, Matthew B. Wheeler, Hassaan Majeed, Young Jae Lee, Catherine A Best-Popescu, Xi Chen, Chenfei Hu and Mingguang Shan. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Biomedical Optics, Advanced Healthcare Materials, Nature Communications and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact