Mike Fraser

3.4k citations
109 papers · 2.7k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Mike Fraser

105 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Mike Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.7k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 792
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 496
  • Museology 97
  • Social Psychology 326
Replace Maximino Bessa with:
Maximino Bessa Portugal
Michael Haller Austria
Mark D. Gross United States
Hai‐Ning Liang China
Orit Shaer United States
Boriana N. Koleva United Kingdom
Margherita Antona Greece
Maribeth Gandy United States
Alan B. Craig United States
Nick Bryan–Kinns United Kingdom
Mike Fraser relative to Maximino Bessa Portugal Maximino Bessa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Maximino Bessa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mike Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Fraser. The network helps show where Mike Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mike Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mike Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Mike Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005360
2 1998193
3 2000141
4 2016114
5 201799
6 200189
7 199977
8 200275
9 200171
10 201766
11 200064
12 202063
13 201062
14 200461
15 202061
16 200352
17 201144
18 200344
19 201243
20 200141

About Mike Fraser

Mike Fraser is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (33 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (23 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (20 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (19 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (9 papers) and Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (1.7k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (792 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (496 citations), Museology (97 citations) and Social Psychology (326 citations). Mike Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Steve Benford, Jon Hindmarsh, Christian Heath, Chris Greenhalgh, Claire L O’Malley, Stuart Reeves, Jess McIntosh, Asier Marzo, Carol Ann Phillips and Holger M. Schnädelbach. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials Technologies, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), IEEE Pervasive Computing and Computers & Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact