Michelle Stempel
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 55
- Surgery 10
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 10
- Co-authors
- Monica Morrow (34 shared papers)Sujata Patil (28 shared papers)Monica Morrow (26 shared papers)Tari A. King (16 shared papers)Anne Eaton (24 shared papers)Emily C. Zabor (23 shared papers)Mary L. Gemignani (23 shared papers)Hiram S. Cody (18 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Surgical Oncology (53 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (8 papers)Cancer (5 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (3 papers)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Michelle Stempel
90 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cancer Research 1.8k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 562
- Oncology 462
- Surgery 731
- Genetics 252
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Stempel
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Stempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Stempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Stempel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Stempel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Stempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Stempel. The network helps show where Michelle Stempel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Stempel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 90 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 257 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 159 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 111 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 100 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 91 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 80 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 79 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 73 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 69 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 69 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 69 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 61 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 57 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 52 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 46 |
About Michelle Stempel
Michelle Stempel is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (55 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (10 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (4 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (3 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.8k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (562 citations), Oncology (462 citations), Surgery (731 citations) and Genetics (252 citations). Michelle Stempel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Monica Morrow, Sujata Patil, Monica Morrow, Tari A. King, Anne Eaton, Emily C. Zabor, Mary L. Gemignani, Hiram S. Cody, Michelle Sampson and Melissa Pilewskie. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer, The American Journal of Surgery and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.