Michelle Camicia

26 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

Michelle Camicia
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Rehabilitation 251
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 13
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 131
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
  • Epidemiology 217
Replace Anne Melbourn with:
Anne Melbourn United Kingdom
Tara Purvis Australia
Janet Prvu‐Bettger United States
Kate Howie United Kingdom
Diane Ames United Kingdom
T. B. Wyller Norway
James D. Halbert United States
Renae J. McNamara Australia
Caroline Fryer Australia
Bernard Gibbon United Kingdom
Michelle Camicia relative to Anne Melbourn United Kingdom Anne Melbourn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Anne Melbourn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Camicia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Camicia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Camicia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Camicia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Camicia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Camicia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Camicia. The network helps show where Michelle Camicia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Camicia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle Camicia Line = papers co-authored together Michelle Camicia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201257
2 201352
3 201549
4 201148
5 201436
6 202134
7 201825
8 201123
9 201323
10 201923
11 201622
12 201521
13 202017
14 202110
15 20128
16 20218
17 20247
18 20225
19 20244
20 20214

About Michelle Camicia

Michelle Camicia is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (251 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (131 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (31 citations) and Epidemiology (217 citations). Michelle Camicia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Lutz, M. Elizabeth Sandel, Hua Wang, Jacqueline Mix, Margaret A. DiVita, Paulette Niewczyk, Brian R. Theodore, Mary Anne Armstrong, Joseph Terdiman and Yun‐Yi Hung. Their work appears in journals such as Rehabilitation Nursing, PM&R, Stroke, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact