Michaela Schiøtz

30 papers receiving 809 citations

Peers

Michaela Schiøtz
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 50
  • Family Practice 19
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 144
  • Epidemiology 263
  • General Health Professions 144
Replace Lidwien Lemmens with:
Lidwien Lemmens Netherlands
Charlotte Paddison United Kingdom
Pauline Boeckxstaens Belgium
Árún K. Sigurðardóttir Iceland
Krista K. Proia United States
Ellen Chen United States
Antje Erler Germany
Deborah H. Boehm United States
Doriane Miller United States
Penny Carver United States
Michaela Schiøtz relative to Lidwien Lemmens Netherlands Lidwien Lemmens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Lidwien Lemmens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaela Schiøtz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaela Schiøtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaela Schiøtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaela Schiøtz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaela Schiøtz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaela Schiøtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaela Schiøtz. The network helps show where Michaela Schiøtz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaela Schiøtz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaela Schiøtz Line = papers co-authored together Michaela Schiøtz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017140
2 2011114
3 2019113
4 201258
5 201644
6 201138
7 201035
8 202035
9 201833
10 201030
11 201730
12 201728
13 201319
14 200818
15 201117
16 202015
17 201113
18 202211
19 201210
20 20136

About Michaela Schiøtz

Michaela Schiøtz is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Clinical Psychology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 834 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (7 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (50 citations), Family Practice (19 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (144 citations), Epidemiology (263 citations) and General Health Professions (144 citations). Michaela Schiøtz has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Anne Frølich, Anders Stockmarr, Ingrid Willaing, Dorte Høst, Thomas Almdal, Mette Bøgelund, Charlotte Glümer, Ramunë Jacobsen, Bjarne Bruun Jensen and Nermin Ghith. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Diabetic Medicine and Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact