Michael Williams

27 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Michael Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Surgery 185
  • Urology 25
  • Rehabilitation 25
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 84
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 57
Replace John C. Kirkham with:
John C. Kirkham United States
Umar Farooque Pakistan
Kevin Clarke United States
Chad R. Gordon United States
L D'Alessandro Italy
Ahmet Çelik Türkiye
M. Cody O’Dell United States
Renata Sánchez Venezuela
Thomas L. Chung United States
Hamed Ghoddusi Johari Iran
Michael Williams relative to John C. Kirkham United States John C. Kirkham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John C. Kirkham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Williams. The network helps show where Michael Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Williams Line = papers co-authored together Michael Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000177
2
Outpatient burns: prevention and care.
201251
3 202039
4 202128
5 202016
6 201312
7 20199
8 20229
9 20228
10 19898
11 20186
12 20215
13
Pilot Study of the Effects of Supraliminal Bipolar Primes on Occupational Educators' Viewing Time and Perceived Confidence with Desktop Virtual Reality
20083
14 20203
15 20043
16 20203
17 20222
18 20202
19 20251
20 20241

About Michael Williams

Michael Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Finance, having authored 29 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), European Monetary and Fiscal Policies (2 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper) and Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (185 citations), Urology (25 citations), Rehabilitation (25 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (84 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (57 citations). Michael Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include James C. Squire, Philip Seifert, Elazer R. Edelman, Campbell Rogers, Joseph Garasic, Edward Turos, Marlon Perera, Patrick Telöken, Andrew Morton and Peter Donato. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Vascular Surgery, British Journal of Urology, ANZ Journal of Surgery, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Journal of Vascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact