Michael White

2.7k citations
106 papers · 1.5k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael White

95 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael White
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 318
  • Rehabilitation 152
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 108
  • Biomedical Engineering 416
  • Public Administration 32
Replace Stephen Murgatroyd with:
Stephen Murgatroyd United Kingdom
John Newman Australia
Ralf Brand Germany
Matthew Cole United Kingdom
Robert Rider United States
Peder Mortvedt Isager Netherlands
Emma Banister United Kingdom
Neil Garrett United Kingdom
Robert J. Rosenthal United States
Min Jeong Kwon South Korea
Michael White relative to Stephen Murgatroyd United Kingdom Stephen Murgatroyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.9×
Stephen Murgatroyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael White. The network helps show where Michael White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael White Line = papers co-authored together Michael White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Re-Authoring Lives: Interviews & Essays
1998165
2 1993132
3 1982131
4 1981125
5 198497
6 200668
7 198367
8 198261
9 198560
10 198444
11 196635
12 199230
13 198429
14 198727
15 199124
16 200422
17 196521
18 196817
19 202216
20 201816

About Michael White

Michael White is a scholar working on Philosophy, Biomedical Engineering, Anthropology, Archeology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 106 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (23 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (9 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (6 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (5 papers), Sports Performance and Training (5 papers) and Groundwater flow and contamination studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (318 citations), Rehabilitation (152 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (108 citations), Biomedical Engineering (416 citations) and Public Administration (32 citations). Michael White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. T. M. Davies, H. Yokoyama, M. J. N. McDonagh, Parmod Chand, Lin Lean Lim, Mary M. Kritz, Paul Brooksby, Seymour Feshbach, David I. Kertzer and John Gribbin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Apeiron, Science & Technology Libraries, Phytochemistry and World Patent Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact