Michael Tye
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.05%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 53
- Philosophy 36
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 23
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 11
- Co-authors
- Brian Cutter (2 shared papers)Brian P. McLaughlin (2 shared papers)R. M. Sainsbury (2 shared papers)Alex Byrne (1 shared paper)Ned Block (1 shared paper)Daniel C. Dennett (1 shared paper)Alastair Hannay (1 shared paper)Richard A. Fumerton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analysis (17 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (14 papers)Philosophical Studies (12 papers)The Philosophical Review (7 papers)Mind (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
Michael Tye
135 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Michael Tye's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- History and Philosophy of Science 1.3k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.0k
- Philosophy 1.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.4k
- Social Psychology 745
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tye
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tye more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tye
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tye. The network helps show where Michael Tye may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 142 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ten Problems of Consciousness Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 927 |
| 2 | 2000 | 770 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 204 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 155 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 106 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 90 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 86 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 82 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 79 | |
| 10 | Consciousness and Persons: Unity and Identity | 2003 | 79 |
| 11 | 2001 | 77 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 75 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 72 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 65 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 65 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 63 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 62 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 52 |
About Michael Tye
Michael Tye is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 142 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (53 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (23 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (11 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (11 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.0k citations), Philosophy (1.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.4k citations) and Social Psychology (745 citations). Michael Tye has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Brian Cutter, Brian P. McLaughlin, R. M. Sainsbury, Alex Byrne, Ned Block, Daniel C. Dennett, Alastair Hannay, Richard A. Fumerton, D. M. Armstrong and Norman Malcolm. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, The Philosophical Review and Mind.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.