Michael Tombs

34 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

Michael Tombs
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 164
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 91
  • Numerical Analysis 68
  • Mechanics of Materials 238
  • Biomedical Engineering 188
Replace Rainer Niekamp with:
Rainer Niekamp Germany
David Néron France
Vamshi Korivi United States
Stephan Schmidt Germany
Kevin J. Dowding United States
Hamed Babazadeh United States
Pierre‐Alain Boucard France
Ton Backx Netherlands
J. P. Moitinho de Almeida Portugal
B. M. Fraeijs de Veubeke Belgium
Michael Tombs relative to Rainer Niekamp Germany Rainer Niekamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Rainer Niekamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Tombs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Tombs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Tombs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Tombs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Tombs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Tombs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Tombs. The network helps show where Michael Tombs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Tombs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Tombs Line = papers co-authored together Michael Tombs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987166
2 200657
3 201341
4 200331
5 201724
6 200620
7 201720
8 201716
9 200214
10 201812
11 201912
12
How a Coriolis mass flow meter can operate in two phase (gas/liquid) flow
200411
13 200510
14 20088
15 20038
16 19868
17 20168
18 20027
19 20207
20 20196

About Michael Tombs

Michael Tombs is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 34 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Flow Measurement and Analysis (25 papers), Advanced Sensor Technologies Research (13 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (12 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (6 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (5 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (3 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (3 papers) and Water Systems and Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (164 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (91 citations), Numerical Analysis (68 citations), Mechanics of Materials (238 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (188 citations). Michael Tombs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Ian Postlethwaite, Manus Henry, Mihaela Duta, Mayela Zamora, Martin Davy, Felix Leach, C. Clark, R. Cheesewright, Salah Karout and Frank Kenyery. Their work appears in journals such as Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Control Engineering Practice, International Journal of Control, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control and IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact