Michael To

2.3k citations
69 papers · 1.7k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

    • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 16
    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 7
    • Hip disorders and treatments 4
    • Surgical Simulation and Training 3
    • Connective tissue disorders research 12

Michael To

66 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Michael To
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Biomaterials 316
  • Rehabilitation 128
  • Biomedical Engineering 662
  • Pharmaceutical Science 75
  • Surgery 379
Replace Zheng Wang with:
Zheng Wang China
Tingjun Ye China
Laura Sáenz del Burgo Spain
Limin Ma China
Antonia Icaro Cornaglia Italy
Patricia Connolly United Kingdom
Feng Lin China
Tianxu Zhang China
Jinlin Song China
Michael To relative to Zheng Wang China Zheng Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Zheng Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael To

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael To's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael To with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael To more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael To

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael To. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael To. The network helps show where Michael To may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael To, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael To Line = papers co-authored together Michael To links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015199
2 2021191
3 2013164
4 2011163
5 2013103
6 202274
7 201766
8 201365
9 202060
10 202351
11 199650
12 201247
13 201337
14 201729
15 202026
16 201624
17 200923
18 201923
19 202122
20 202420

About Michael To

Michael To is a scholar working on Surgery, Genetics, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (16 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (12 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (4 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (316 citations), Rehabilitation (128 citations), Biomedical Engineering (662 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (75 citations) and Surgery (379 citations). Michael To has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kwk Yeung, Zhijia Tan, Xuelai Liu, Ho Cheung Shum, Kenneth K. Wong, Kmc Cheung, Danny Chan, Wilson Cheuk Wing Chan, Jun Wu and Liqiu Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Spine Deformity, Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine, European Spine Journal, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research and Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact