Michael Stokes

28 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Michael Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 396
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 88
  • Family Practice 8
  • Immunology and Allergy 24
  • Sensory Systems 17
Replace Sally Mannix with:
Sally Mannix United States
Barbara A. Muller United States
Dixie Ecklund United States
K.H. Simpson United Kingdom
Ercolie R. Bossema Netherlands
Beth Morris United States
Hülya Şirin Türkiye
Karen Stadnyk Canada
Scott Haughie United Kingdom
Sara Wang United States
Michael Stokes relative to Sally Mannix United States Sally Mannix's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Sally Mannix · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stokes. The network helps show where Michael Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012248
2 2011201
3
A Practical Guide to Mentoring, Coaching and Peer-networking: Teacher Professional Development in Schools and Colleges
200458
4 200430
5 201620
6 201016
7 201315
8 201213
9 202412
10 201411
11 20139
12 20178
13 20138
14 20236
15 20235
16 20233
17 20153
18 19943
19
Legal Issues arising from the Pulp Mill Permit issued under the Pulp Mill Assessment Act 2007 (Tasmania)
20112
20 19992

About Michael Stokes

Michael Stokes is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Law and Rheumatology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (396 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (88 citations), Family Practice (8 citations), Immunology and Allergy (24 citations) and Sensory Systems (17 citations). Michael Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Lipton, Sepideh F. Varon, Teresa K. Wilcox, Dawn C. Buse, Andrew Blumenfeld, Peter J. Goadsby, Lisa Bloudek, Christopher Rhodes, Zaza Katsarava and Michel Lantéri‐Minet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Economics, Law and Philosophy, Current Medical Research and Opinion, ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact