Michael Starr

5k citations
116 papers · 4.1k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Starr

112 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Michael Starr
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Soil Science 1.6k
  • Environmental Chemistry 659
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 652
  • Forestry 173
  • Ecology 845
Replace Jean‐Christophe Clément with:
Jean‐Christophe Clément France
Wesley M. Jarrell United States
Laurent Augusto France
P. K. Khanna Australia
Daniel Markewitz United States
Nicholas Clarke Norway
John M. Stark United States
E.C. Rowe United Kingdom
Patrick Schleppi Switzerland
Charles T. Garten United States
Michael Starr relative to Jean‐Christophe Clément France Jean‐Christophe Clément's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Jean‐Christophe Clément · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Starr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Starr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Starr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Starr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Starr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Starr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Starr. The network helps show where Michael Starr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Starr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Starr Line = papers co-authored together Michael Starr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004222
2 2012208
3 2000145
4 2003138
5 2002115
6 2004112
7 2009109
8 1998102
9 200796
10 201593
11 199490
12 200088
13
Critical loads of acidic deposition for forest soils: Is the current approach adequate?
199687
14 200585
15 200480
16 201378
17 198177
18 201377
19 201366
20 199865

About Michael Starr

Michael Starr is a scholar working on Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Water Science and Technology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (59 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (20 papers), Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (12 papers), Environmental and biological studies (11 papers), Soil and Environmental Studies (9 papers) and Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (1.6k citations), Environmental Chemistry (659 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (652 citations), Forestry (173 citations) and Ecology (845 citations). Michael Starr has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Ethiopia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Leena Finér, Sirpa Piirainen, Hannu Mannerkoski, Marjo Palviainen, Mesele Negash, Liisa Ukonmaanaho, Pekka Tamminen, Syed Ashraful Alam, Anne-Marie Kurka and Barnaby J.F. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Plant and Soil, Geoderma, Forest Ecology and Management, Water Air & Soil Pollution and Silva Fennica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact