Michael Stanton

1.1k citations
20 papers · 903 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Stanton

20 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

Michael Stanton
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 239
  • Biotechnology 101
  • Oncology 188
  • Molecular Biology 291
  • Surgery 158
Replace Robert Zuk with:
Robert Zuk United States
Giovanni Francesco Fasciglione Italy
Naoki Sakurai Japan
Yuedi Ding China
Masatoshi Fujiwara Japan
Marianne Lind Denmark
Gregory S. Retzinger United States
Jingjing Feng China
Dieter Gebauer Germany
Shih‐Chia Liu Taiwan
Michael Stanton relative to Robert Zuk United States Robert Zuk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Robert Zuk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stanton. The network helps show where Michael Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stanton Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stanton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2015243
2 1999182
3 2017117
4 199469
5 199360
6 201542
7 201539
8 199233
9 199625
10 201518
11 198417
12 201714
13 197113
14 201910
15 20157
16 19837
17 19714
18 19961
19 19751
20
Peptic ulcer surgery and the Paneth cell.
19821

About Michael Stanton

Michael Stanton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Genetics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 903 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (4 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (4 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (2 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers), Microscopic Colitis (2 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (239 citations), Biotechnology (101 citations), Oncology (188 citations), Molecular Biology (291 citations) and Surgery (158 citations). Michael Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include N.J. Garrahan, Mark Tangney, Panos Lehouritis, Florence O. McCarthy, Camilla Urbaniak, Gregor Reid, C. Murphy, William L. Byrne, Juliet Compston and Joanne Cummins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Pathology, Bone, Osteoporosis International, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research and Current Gene Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact