Michael Stanton
Impact in
-
- Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Bone and Joint Diseases
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Cancer Research and Treatments
Papers in
-
- bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research 2
- Gut microbiota and health 2
-
- Cancer Research and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- N.J. Garrahan (7 shared papers)Mark Tangney (5 shared papers)Panos Lehouritis (3 shared papers)Florence O. McCarthy (2 shared papers)William L. Byrne (1 shared paper)Gregor Reid (1 shared paper)Karen L. Bell (3 shared papers)C. Murphy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (2 papers)Bone (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Pathology (2 papers)Osteoporosis International (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael Stanton
21 papers receiving 833 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 246
- Biotechnology 96
- Oncology 198
- Surgery 195
- Molecular Biology 298
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stanton
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stanton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stanton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stanton. The network helps show where Michael Stanton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stanton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 234 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 179 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 116 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 57 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 53 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 1 |
About Michael Stanton
Michael Stanton is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Genetics, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (4 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (4 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (2 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (2 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (246 citations), Biotechnology (96 citations), Oncology (198 citations), Surgery (195 citations) and Molecular Biology (298 citations). Michael Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include N.J. Garrahan, Mark Tangney, Panos Lehouritis, Florence O. McCarthy, William L. Byrne, Gregor Reid, Karen L. Bell, C. Murphy, N. Loveridge and Joanne Cummins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Bone, Journal of Clinical Pathology, Osteoporosis International and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.