Michael Spanner

3.8k citations
69 papers · 3.2k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Spanner

69 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Michael Spanner
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 128
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 90
  • Spectroscopy 122
  • Radiation 33
Replace Edvardas Narevicius with:
Edvardas Narevicius Israel
Bryan J. Dalton Australia
Elmar Haller Austria
T. Yabuzaki Japan
M Aymar France
S. Guérin France
Ángel S. Sanz Spain
Eliane Luc-Koenig France
Szczepan Chelkowski Canada
Osman Atabek France
Michael Spanner relative to Edvardas Narevicius Israel Edvardas Narevicius's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Edvardas Narevicius · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Spanner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Spanner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Spanner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Spanner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Spanner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Spanner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Spanner. The network helps show where Michael Spanner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Spanner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Spanner Line = papers co-authored together Michael Spanner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005283
2 2005241
3 2004204
4 2012177
5 2008153
6 2017138
7 2003128
8 2014121
9 2009118
10 2004104
11 200695
12 200292
13 201190
14 201277
15 201677
16 200474
17 201264
18 200361
19 201361
20 200659

About Michael Spanner

Michael Spanner is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 69 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (54 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (3 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (2 papers) and Machine Learning in Materials Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (128 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (90 citations), Spectroscopy (122 citations) and Radiation (33 citations). Michael Spanner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Misha Ivanov, Olga V. Smirnova, Serguei Patchkovskii, P. B. Corkum, David M. Villeneuve, Albert Stolow, Paul W. Brumer, Isaac Tamblyn, Kyle Mills and Jochen Mikosch. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Journal of Modern Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact