Michael Shantz

510 citations
15 papers · 382 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Shantz

15 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Michael Shantz
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 220
  • Computational Mechanics 179
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 156
  • Human-Computer Interaction 33
  • Biophysics 11
Replace Jung‐Hong Chuang with:
Jung‐Hong Chuang Taiwan
Taewoong Kang United States
Mathias Parger Austria
Peter‐Pike J. Sloan United States
William Martin United States
Jianmin Bao China
Tyson Brochu Canada
Dimitri Plemenos France
Yue Jiang Finland
Tien-Tsin Wong Hong Kong
Michael Shantz relative to Jung‐Hong Chuang Taiwan Jung‐Hong Chuang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Jung‐Hong Chuang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shantz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shantz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shantz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shantz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shantz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shantz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shantz. The network helps show where Michael Shantz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shantz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Shantz Line = papers co-authored together Michael Shantz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199881
2 198150
3 198749
4 198743
5 197829
6 198225
7 198724
8 198720
9 200118
10 200215
11 201312
12 19997
13 19834
14 19983
15 19822

About Michael Shantz

Michael Shantz is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 15 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (8 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (5 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (3 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (3 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (2 papers), Digital Image Processing Techniques (2 papers) and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (220 citations), Computational Mechanics (179 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (156 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (33 citations) and Biophysics (11 citations). Michael Shantz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vaughan Pratt, Turner Whitted, David H. Eberly, G. D. McCann, Howard Poizner, Michael Cox, Edlyn Teske, Fritz B. Prinz and Feng Xie. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Behavior Research Methods, Lecture notes in computer science and ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact