Michael Shank

843 citations
55 papers · 454 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Shank

41 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Michael Shank
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • History and Philosophy of Science 78
  • Archeology 114
  • Space and Planetary Science 13
  • Paleontology 64
  • Archeology 7
Replace Greg Dening with:
Greg Dening Australia
Theodore Κ. Rabb United States
José María Spain
Jerry H. Bentley United States
Mark Walker United States
Joan‐Pau Rubiés United Kingdom
Pamela H. Smith United States
Alexandra Walsham United Kingdom
Thomas T. Allsen United States
Henri J. M. Claessen Netherlands
Michael Shank relative to Greg Dening Australia Greg Dening's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Greg Dening · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shank. The network helps show where Michael Shank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Shank Line = papers co-authored together Michael Shank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000117
2 200865
3 201250
4 200022
5 201521
6 201316
7 201316
8 199713
9 19859
10 19989
11 19909
12 20029
13 19928
14 20118
15 20076
16 20176
17 19976
18
Redefining the Movement: Art Activism
20045
19 20095
20 19945

About Michael Shank

Michael Shank is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Archeology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Anthropology and Classics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (9 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (7 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (4 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (78 citations), Archeology (114 citations), Space and Planetary Science (13 citations), Paleontology (64 citations) and Archeology (7 citations). Michael Shank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Clive Ruggles, Lisa Schirch, Bill Fulkerson, George Saliba, David C. Lindberg, Sara Cobb, Edward Maibach, K. M. Cobb, Jay Gulledge and Anthony Leiserowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Early Science and Medicine, The American Historical Review, Isis, Journal of the History of Biology and Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact