Michael S. Singer

5.9k citations
72 papers · 3.4k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Michael S. Singer

70 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Michael S. Singer
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Insect Science 1.8k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 793
  • Ecological Modeling 210
  • Ecology 821
Replace Saskya van Nouhuys with:
Saskya van Nouhuys Finland
Steph B. J. Menken Netherlands
John E. Losey United States
Benoît Facon France
Nicholas J. Mills United States
Woodruff W. Benson Brazil
J. Howard Frank United States
Wesley Dáttilo Mexico
Gimme H. Walter Australia
Karsten Schönrogge United Kingdom
Michael S. Singer relative to Saskya van Nouhuys Finland Saskya van Nouhuys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Saskya van Nouhuys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Singer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Singer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Singer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Singer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Singer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Singer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Singer. The network helps show where Michael S. Singer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Singer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael S. Singer Line = papers co-authored together Michael S. Singer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007388
2 2005246
3 2011212
4 2009209
5 2008184
6 2005152
7 2004116
8 2002109
9 200495
10 200389
11 200389
12 200385
13 200476
14 201275
15 201271
16 200567
17 200364
18 201058
19 201457
20 200154

About Michael S. Singer

Michael S. Singer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Molecular Biology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (31 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (29 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (13 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers) and Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.8k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (793 citations), Ecological Modeling (210 citations) and Ecology (821 citations). Michael S. Singer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John O. Stireman, Elizabeth A. Bernays, John T. Lill, Yves Carrière, Lee A. Dyer, Kevi Mace, Daniela Rodrigues, Peri A. Mason, Kailen A. Mooney and Claudine Theuring. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Oecologia, Oikos, Journal of Comparative Physiology A and Journal of Experimental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact