Michael S. Pierce

843 citations
31 papers · 647 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Michael S. Pierce

31 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Michael S. Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Structural Biology 59
  • Condensed Matter Physics 153
  • Radiation 93
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 244
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 139
Replace Yasuhiko Imai with:
Yasuhiko Imai Japan
Koichi Izumi Japan
Arjun Rana United States
S. Nagashima Japan
Kayla X. Nguyen United States
Hamed Heidari Belgium
Christian Denker Germany
A. Savoia Italy
Alan Pryor United States
Michael S. Pierce relative to Yasuhiko Imai Japan Yasuhiko Imai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Yasuhiko Imai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Pierce. The network helps show where Michael S. Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael S. Pierce Line = papers co-authored together Michael S. Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007101
2 200590
3 200368
4 201150
5 201742
6 201342
7 201833
8 200930
9 200826
10 201625
11 201918
12 201517
13 199913
14 201512
15 201212
16 20129
17 20188
18 20178
19 20177
20 20125

About Michael S. Pierce

Michael S. Pierce is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation and Materials Chemistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (8 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (6 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (5 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (59 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (153 citations), Radiation (93 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (244 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (139 citations). Michael S. Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Hoydoo You, S. D. Kevan, L. B. Sorensen, Eric E. Fullerton, Vladimír Komanický, Olav Hellwig, Gerald V. Doyle, Daniel Hennessy, Mark C. Connelly and Jeffrey B. Kortright. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Electrochimica Acta, IEEE Magnetics Letters and Journal of Applied Crystallography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact