Michael Pyne
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Microbiology top 10%
Papers in
- Ecology 11
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 9
-
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 9
- Co-authors
- Stephen D. Johnston (20 shared papers)V. Nicolson (14 shared papers)Dennis A. Guenther (2 shared papers)W. Riley Garrott (2 shared papers)Gary J. Heydinger (1 shared paper)Frank Carrick (5 shared papers)William V. Holt (3 shared papers)Camryn D. Allen (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Australian Veterinary Journal (5 papers)Reproduction Fertility and Development (4 papers)Australian Journal of Zoology (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Journal of Comparative Pathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Michael Pyne
38 papers receiving 479 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Reproductive Medicine 65
- Microbiology 43
- Automotive Engineering 88
- Agronomy and Crop Science 64
- Small Animals 43
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pyne
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pyne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pyne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pyne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pyne. The network helps show where Michael Pyne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pyne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 9 |
About Michael Pyne
Michael Pyne is a scholar working on Ecology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Small Animals and Microbiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (9 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (5 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers) and Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (65 citations), Microbiology (43 citations), Automotive Engineering (88 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (64 citations) and Small Animals (43 citations). Michael Pyne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Johnston, V. Nicolson, Dennis A. Guenther, W. Riley Garrott, Gary J. Heydinger, Frank Carrick, William V. Holt, Camryn D. Allen, M.J. Cunningham and Isabel Castro. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Veterinary Journal, Reproduction Fertility and Development, Australian Journal of Zoology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Comparative Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.