Michael Pluto
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
Papers in
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 6
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 7
- Co-authors
- A. Reiners (2 shared papers)Johannes Winkler (2 shared papers)W. Seifert (1 shared paper)Eike W. Guenther (1 shared paper)Sebastian Schäfer (1 shared paper)Andreas Quirrenbach (1 shared paper)Ulrike Lemke (1 shared paper)José A. Caballero (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Astronomy and Astrophysics (3 papers)Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII (2 papers)Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Michael Pluto
9 papers receiving 824 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Instrumentation 109
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 782
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 10
- Global and Planetary Change 3
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pluto
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pluto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pluto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pluto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pluto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pluto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pluto. The network helps show where Michael Pluto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pluto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 234 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 203 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 140 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 94 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 8 |
About Michael Pluto
Michael Pluto is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 867 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (109 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (782 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (10 citations), Global and Planetary Change (3 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1 citation). Michael Pluto has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include A. Reiners, Johannes Winkler, W. Seifert, Eike W. Guenther, Sebastian Schäfer, Andreas Quirrenbach, Ulrike Lemke, José A. Caballero, R. Mundt and Pedro José Amado. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.