Michael Peterer

428 citations
4 papers · 288 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
    • Mechanical and Optical Resonators
    • Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
    • Quantum optics and atomic interactions
    • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
    • Quantum Information and Cryptography
    • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Papers in

Michael Peterer

4 papers receiving 282 citations

Peers

Michael Peterer
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 234
  • Artificial Intelligence 161
  • Biomedical Engineering 61
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 13
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 48
Replace Joel Grebel with:
Joel Grebel United States
Christopher R. Conner United States
E. Zalys-Geller United States
Yago del Valle‐Inclan Redondo United Kingdom
F. van Riggelen Netherlands
Vasil Rokaj United States
J. H. Quilter United Kingdom
Xiao-Jing Lu China
Michael Peterer relative to Joel Grebel United States Joel Grebel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Joel Grebel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Peterer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Peterer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Peterer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Peterer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Peterer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Peterer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Peterer. The network helps show where Michael Peterer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael Peterer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Peterer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Peterer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown

About Michael Peterer

Michael Peterer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Infectious Diseases, having authored 4 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (2 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (2 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (2 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers), ZnO doping and properties (1 paper), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (1 paper), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (1 paper) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (234 citations), Artificial Intelligence (161 citations), Biomedical Engineering (61 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (13 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (48 citations). Michael Peterer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Leek, Riccardo Manenti, E. B. Magnusson, Ani Nersisyan, Simon Gustavsson, Andrew D. Patterson, Archana Kamal, Terry P. Orlando, Samuel James Bader and Xiaoyue Jin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B. and Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact