Michael Peneder

2.4k citations
80 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Peneder

63 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Peneder
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.0k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 265
  • Strategy and Management 382
  • Marketing 206
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 127
Replace Valentina Meliciani with:
Valentina Meliciani Italy
Josep-Maria Arauzo‐Carod Spain
Dolores Añón Higón Spain
Larry D. Qiu Hong Kong
Gerald Silverberg Netherlands
Bernhard Dachs Austria
Linhui Yu China
Rosina Moreno Spain
Caroline Paunov France
Jordi Jaumandreu Spain
Michael Peneder relative to Valentina Meliciani Italy Valentina Meliciani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Valentina Meliciani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Peneder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Peneder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Peneder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Peneder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Peneder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Peneder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Peneder. The network helps show where Michael Peneder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Peneder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Peneder Line = papers co-authored together Michael Peneder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003338
2 2017205
3 200374
4 201664
5 200357
6 201355
7 200947
8 200741
9 201739
10 201736
11 200836
12 201635
13 200728
14 202126
15 200225
16 201222
17 200721
18 201721
19 201720
20 201017

About Michael Peneder

Michael Peneder is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Accounting, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Firm Innovation and Growth (20 papers), Regional Development and Policy (17 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (13 papers), Global trade and economics (12 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (11 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (8 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (8 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (1.0k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (265 citations), Strategy and Management (382 citations), Marketing (206 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (127 citations). Michael Peneder has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Martin Woerter, Tobias Stucki, Christian Rammer, Spyros Arvanitis, Serguei Kaniovski, Bernhard Dachs, Egon Smeral, Martin Wörter, Sandra Gottschalk and Karl Aiginger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Empirica, National Institute Economic Review, Journal of Industry Competition and Trade and Energy Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact