Michael Peil

1.2k citations
22 papers · 962 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Peil

21 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers

Michael Peil
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 501
  • Computer Networks and Communications 252
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 485
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 7
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 88
Replace M. C. Torrent with:
M. C. Torrent Spain
Guillermo Huerta-Cuellar Mexico
Viacheslav N. Chizhevsky Belarus
Jonathan N. Blakely United States
Gregory D. VanWiggeren United States
Josep Mulet Spain
Cong Xu China
Jean‐Marie Bilbault France
Yunzhen Zhang China
A. S. Dmitriev Russia
Michael Peil relative to M. C. Torrent Spain M. C. Torrent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
M. C. Torrent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Peil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Peil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Peil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Peil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Peil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Peil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Peil. The network helps show where Michael Peil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Peil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Peil Line = papers co-authored together Michael Peil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006267
2 2009123
3 2005108
4 200992
5 200291
6 200257
7 200555
8 200740
9 200639
10 200627
11 200616
12 200412
13 20049
14 20069
15 20085
16 20034
17
Spectral broadband dynamics of semiconductor lasers with resonant short cavities (13 pages)
20062
18 20072
19 20021
20 20031

About Michael Peil

Michael Peil is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Acoustics and Ultrasonics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 22 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (19 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (15 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (3 papers), Random lasers and scattering media (1 paper), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (1 paper) and Optical measurement and interference techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (501 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (252 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (485 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (7 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (88 citations). Michael Peil has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ingo Fischer, Laurent Larger, Cláudio R. Mirasso, Wolfgang Elsäßer, Maxime Jacquot, Raúl Vicente, Jordi García‐Ojalvo, M. C. Torrent, Javier Martín Buldú and Tilmann Heil. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, Optics Communications, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics and Comptes Rendus Physique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact