Michael Peil

863 citations
17 papers · 691 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Peil

17 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

Michael Peil
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 379
  • Computer Networks and Communications 446
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 7
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 90
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 273
Replace K. Scott Thornburg with:
K. Scott Thornburg United States
V. S. Udaltsov France
Tao Deng China
Otti D’Huys Germany
J. Mulet Spain
Thomas Jüngling Australia
M. C. Torrent Spain
Lucas Illing United States
Juan Hugo García-López Mexico
Kenji Matsumoto Japan
Michael Peil relative to K. Scott Thornburg United States K. Scott Thornburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
K. Scott Thornburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Peil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Peil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Peil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Peil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Peil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Peil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Peil. The network helps show where Michael Peil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael Peil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Peil Line = papers co-authored together Michael Peil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2006256
2 2009117
3 200989
4 200257
5 200739
6 200639
7 200627
8 200617
9 200412
10 201212
11 20049
12 20068
13 20034
14 20122
15 20021
16 20051
17 20031

About Michael Peil

Michael Peil is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (11 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (7 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (6 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (5 papers), Optical Network Technologies (3 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers) and European and International Law Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (379 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (446 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (7 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (273 citations). Michael Peil has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ingo Fischer, Laurent Larger, Cláudio R. Mirasso, Maxime Jacquot, Raúl Vicente, M. C. Torrent, Jordi García‐Ojalvo, Javier M. Buldú, Wolfgang Elsäßer and Yanne K. Chembo. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, Comptes Rendus Physique, Applied Physics Letters and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact