Michael O’Toole

1.2k citations
48 papers · 622 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Michael O’Toole

42 papers receiving 595 citations

Peers

Michael O’Toole
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Literature and Literary Theory 130
  • Geophysics 109
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 6
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
  • Language and Linguistics 61
Replace Mark Driscoll with:
Mark Driscoll Canada
Bernd Henning Germany
Fang Guo China
Jiren Liu China
Tobias Baur Germany
R.J.J.H. van Son Netherlands
R.B. Pope United States
Saleh Al-Shehri Saudi Arabia
Alan Hoi Lun Yau Canada
Michael O’Toole relative to Mark Driscoll Canada Mark Driscoll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Mark Driscoll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Toole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Toole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Toole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Toole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Toole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Toole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Toole. The network helps show where Michael O’Toole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Toole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Toole Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Toole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996162
2 199949
3 201746
4 201542
5 201639
6 201536
7 199022
8 200922
9 198920
10 201219
11 201717
12 202314
13 201512
14 201011
15 19839
16 20198
17 20178
18 20168
19 20157
20 20077

About Michael O’Toole

Michael O’Toole is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Geophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Ocean Engineering, having authored 48 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (13 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (13 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (10 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (5 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (4 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (3 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (130 citations), Geophysics (109 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (6 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations) and Language and Linguistics (61 citations). Michael O’Toole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Peyton, Liam A. Marsh, John L. Davidson, Noushin Karimian, David Armitage, David Kerr, Kaddour Bouazza‐Marouf, Michael Vloeberghs, Alfred E. Buxton and Michael H. Lehmann. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Sensors Journal, Measurement Science and Technology, Social Semiotics, The Modern Language Review and Robotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact