Michael Oswald

664 citations
75 papers · 493 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Oswald

62 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Michael Oswald
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Aerospace Engineering 113
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 32
  • Ecology 71
  • Developmental Biology 6
  • Social Psychology 56
Replace Darrel M. Kingfield with:
Darrel M. Kingfield United States
Eduardo Morgado Chile
Amanda R. Falk United States
Sarah H. Parcak United States
Donald R. Hill United Kingdom
William Sweet Canada
Alan R. Peterfreund United States
Shiba Subedi Switzerland
Joris Everaert Belgium
Peter Wellnhofer Germany
Michael Oswald relative to Darrel M. Kingfield United States Darrel M. Kingfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Darrel M. Kingfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Oswald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Oswald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Oswald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Oswald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Oswald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Oswald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Oswald. The network helps show where Michael Oswald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Oswald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Oswald Line = papers co-authored together Michael Oswald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201648
2 200843
3 201634
4 197625
5 202123
6 197721
7 199721
8 200517
9 200615
10 201914
11 202113
12 198012
13 202112
14 200411
15
SENSITIVITY OF THE SPACE DEBRIS ENVIRONMENT TO LARGE CONSTELLATIONS AND SMALL SATELLITES
201711
16 202211
17
[Vaporization of urethral stenosis using the KTP 532 laser].
199710
18 202210
19 20239
20 20048

About Michael Oswald

Michael Oswald is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Urology and Social Psychology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Satellite Systems and Control (25 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (5 papers), Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (113 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (32 citations), Ecology (71 citations), Developmental Biology (6 citations) and Social Psychology (56 citations). Michael Oswald has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Barrie D. Robison, J. M. Erwin, Carsten Wiedemann, Peter Vörsmann, Heiner Klinkrad, Elena Broda, Julie N. Oswald, Jay P. Barlow, Frederick I. Archer and Shannon Rankin. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Space Research, Acta Astronautica, Primates, Nature and American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact