Michael O’Neil

3.2k citations
51 papers · 2.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Michael O’Neil

49 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Michael O’Neil
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 434
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Organic Chemistry 420
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 425
  • Biophysics 70
Replace J. M. Drake with:
J. M. Drake United States
Thomas M. Fischer Germany
F. Schneider Germany
Joseph B. Hubbard United States
K. L. Sebastian India
Hisashi Hayashi Japan
Martin Petersilka Germany
Justin S. Smith United States
Wen Li China
Robert Bennett United Kingdom
Michael O’Neil relative to J. M. Drake United States J. M. Drake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
J. M. Drake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Neil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Neil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Neil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Neil. The network helps show where Michael O’Neil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Neil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Neil Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Neil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992370
2 1990298
3 1991268
4 1991207
5 1996186
6 2012132
7 2013120
8 199081
9 199367
10 199464
11 200957
12 201242
13 201839
14 199037
15 199133
16 201330
17 199022
18 199222
19 201322
20 199420

About Michael O’Neil

Michael O’Neil is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (13 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (8 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (6 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (5 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (434 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Organic Chemistry (420 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (425 citations) and Biophysics (70 citations). Michael O’Neil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Wasielewski, Mark P. Niemczyk, Walter A. Svec, George L. Gaines, George McLendon, John A. Marohn, Leslie Greengard, David J. Gosztola, Michael J. Pellin and Keith R. Lykke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Statistics and Computing, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact