Michael O’Neil

3.2k citations
58 papers · 2.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Michael O’Neil

57 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Michael O’Neil
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 483
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Organic Chemistry 440
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 445
  • Biophysics 74
Replace J. M. Drake with:
J. M. Drake United States
K. Watanabe Japan
Simone Melchionna Italy
Thomas M. Fischer Germany
F. Schneider Germany
Joseph B. Hubbard United States
Thierry Deutsch France
Martin Petersilka Germany
K. L. Sebastian India
Michael O’Neil relative to J. M. Drake United States J. M. Drake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. M. Drake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Neil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Neil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Neil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Neil. The network helps show where Michael O’Neil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Neil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Neil Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Neil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992377
2 1990315
3 1991285
4 1991215
5 1996200
6 2012140
7 2013120
8 199088
9 199371
10 199464
11 200958
12 200355
13 199049
14 201243
15 201841
16 199133
17 201330
18 200329
19 199025
20 199224

About Michael O’Neil

Michael O’Neil is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (13 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (10 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (9 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (5 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (5 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (5 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (483 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Organic Chemistry (440 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (445 citations) and Biophysics (74 citations). Michael O’Neil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Wasielewski, Mark P. Niemczyk, Walter A. Svec, George L. Gaines, George McLendon, John A. Marohn, David J. Gosztola, Leslie Greengard, Michael J. Pellin and D. M. Gruen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Physics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, Statistics and Computing and Perfusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact