Michael Naef

24 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael Naef
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • General Decision Sciences 123
  • Safety Research 281
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 334
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 276
  • Applied Psychology 61
Replace Terence C. Burnham with:
Terence C. Burnham United States
Richard Ronay Netherlands
Shigehito Tanida Japan
Mizuho Shinada Japan
Christiane Schwieren Germany
Björn Wallace Sweden
Haruto Takagishi Japan
Jonathan Cowden United States
Agnieszka Tymula Australia
C. Mónica Capra United States
Michael Naef relative to Terence C. Burnham United States Terence C. Burnham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Terence C. Burnham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Naef

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Naef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Naef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Naef more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Naef

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Naef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Naef. The network helps show where Michael Naef may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Naef, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Naef Line = papers co-authored together Michael Naef links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009316
2 2006194
3 2014105
4 200994
5 200990
6 201285
7 201641
8 201931
9 201131
10 201821
11 201720
12 202316
13 200814
14 202013
15 201212
16 20198
17 20237
18 20047
19 20116
20 20195

About Michael Naef

Michael Naef is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Demography and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (9 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (123 citations), Safety Research (281 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (334 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (276 citations) and Applied Psychology (61 citations). Michael Naef has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ernst Fehr, Christoph Eisenegger, Jürgen Schupp, Markus Heinrichs, Romana Snozzi, Klaus M. Schmidt, Trevor W. Robbins, Luke Clark, A.M.W. Linssen and Ulrich Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Translational Psychiatry, The Economic Journal and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact