Michael Munk
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Papers in
- Ecology 4
- Remote Sensing in Agriculture 2
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 2
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 4
- Co-authors
- Jens‐Christian Svenning (6 shared papers)Andreas Schweiger (2 shared papers)Robert Buitenwerf (5 shared papers)Wang Li (3 shared papers)Norman Owen‐Smith (1 shared paper)Paulo R. Guimarães (1 shared paper)Jens M. Olesen (1 shared paper)Mauro Galetti (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Oregon Historical Quarterly (2 papers)Biological Conservation (2 papers)Remote Sensing (1 paper)Global Environmental Change (1 paper)Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Michael Munk
8 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Ecological Modeling 65
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 141
- Ecology 200
- Paleontology 46
- Global and Planetary Change 103
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Munk
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Munk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Munk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Munk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Munk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Munk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Munk. The network helps show where Michael Munk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Munk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 212 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 8 | The Romance of John Reed and Louise Bryant: New Documents Clarify How They Met | 2008 | 1 |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 0 |
About Michael Munk
Michael Munk is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 12 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (3 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (65 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (141 citations), Ecology (200 citations), Paleontology (46 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (103 citations). Michael Munk has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Jens‐Christian Svenning, Andreas Schweiger, Robert Buitenwerf, Wang Li, Norman Owen‐Smith, Paulo R. Guimarães, Jens M. Olesen, Mauro Galetti, Dennis M. Hansen and Robert J. Marquis. Their work appears in journals such as Oregon Historical Quarterly, Biological Conservation, Remote Sensing, Global Environmental Change and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.