Michael Meng

20 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

Michael Meng
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Language and Linguistics 399
  • Linguistics and Language 140
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 171
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 250
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 142
Replace Noortje J. Venhuizen with:
Noortje J. Venhuizen Netherlands
Lisa Pearl United States
Marijan Palmović Croatia
Diogo Almeida United States
Wayne Cowart United States
Luiz Amaral United States
Neil Mayo United Kingdom
Franziska Kretzschmar Germany
Karin Harbusch Germany
Tsuneo Yamada Japan
Michael Meng relative to Noortje J. Venhuizen Netherlands Noortje J. Venhuizen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Noortje J. Venhuizen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Meng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Meng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Meng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Meng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Meng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Meng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Meng. The network helps show where Michael Meng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael Meng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Meng Line = papers co-authored together Michael Meng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001138
2 2000130
3 1998107
4 200062
5 201749
6 202029
7 201827
8 200019
9 201919
10 200218
11 200013
12 20218
13 20236
14 20205
15 20234
16 20004
17 20233
18 20162
19 20202
20 20201

About Michael Meng

Michael Meng is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (12 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (5 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (5 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (399 citations), Linguistics and Language (140 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (171 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (250 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 citations). Michael Meng has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markus Bader, Josef Bayer, Jens‐Max Hopf, Andreas Schubert, Stephanie B. Steinhardt, Andreas Opitz, Denisa Bordag, Seung Yoon Lee, Xi Zou and Nima Ghalichechian. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Brain Research, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Bilingualism Language and Cognition and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact