Michael M. Walker

3.3k citations
60 papers · 2.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michael M. Walker

60 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Michael M. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Biophysics 1.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 443
  • Automotive Engineering 184
  • Ecology 377
  • Molecular Biology 955
Replace Nathan F. Putman with:
Nathan F. Putman United States
Catherine M. F. Lohmann United States
Kenneth J. Lohmann United States
John B. Phillips United States
Ad. J. Kalmijn United States
Rachel Muheim Sweden
Carol E. Diebel New Zealand
Miriam Liedvogel Germany
Hynek Burda Germany
Kenneth P. Able United States
Michael M. Walker relative to Nathan F. Putman United States Nathan F. Putman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Nathan F. Putman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Walker. The network helps show where Michael M. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael M. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael M. Walker Line = papers co-authored together Michael M. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997363
2 2004235
3 2000205
4 1988154
5 2002128
6 1984115
7 1989108
8 198497
9 198588
10 198587
11 200787
12 201080
13 198577
14 200773
15 199271
16 198867
17 199866
18 198958
19 200755
20 200138

About Michael M. Walker

Michael M. Walker is a scholar working on Biophysics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Automotive Engineering, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (36 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (27 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (8 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (8 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (3 papers), Echinoderm biology and ecology (3 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (443 citations), Automotive Engineering (184 citations), Ecology (377 citations) and Molecular Biology (955 citations). Michael M. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph L. Kirschvink, M. E. Bitterman, Carol E. Diebel, Colin Richard Green, John C. Montgomery, Andrew E. Dizon, Cordula V. Mora, Todd E. Dennis, Michael Davison and Patricia M. Pankhurst. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Nature, Journal of Comparative Physiology A and New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact