Michael Lenz

3.2k citations
103 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Lenz

98 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Michael Lenz
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.0k
  • Genetics 1.2k
  • Insect Science 484
  • Genetics 145
  • Aging 21
Replace Alisha K. Holloway with:
Alisha K. Holloway United States
Christelle Le Dantec France
Geert Stangé Belgium
Adrian Alexa Germany
Bingzhong Ren China
Xincheng Zhao China
Michael Lawrence United States
Dariusz Przybylski United States
Kazuyuki Hoshijima United States
Sheng Zhao China
Michael Lenz relative to Alisha K. Holloway United States Alisha K. Holloway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Alisha K. Holloway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lenz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lenz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lenz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lenz. The network helps show where Michael Lenz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lenz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lenz Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lenz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014177
2 2012116
3 2017114
4 200587
5 201669
6
Challenges to subterranean termite management of multi-genera faunas in southeast Asia and Australia
200764
7 199863
8 201058
9 202057
10 201252
11 200051
12 200748
13 198547
14 200947
15 199945
16 200243
17 199340
18 200039
19
Neotenic formation in field colonies of Coptotermes lacteus (Froggatt) in Australia, with comments on the roles of neotenics in the genus Coptotermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae).
198232
20 201532

About Michael Lenz

Michael Lenz is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (62 papers), Plant and animal studies (46 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (20 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (15 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (10 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.0k citations), Genetics (1.2k citations), Insect Science (484 citations), Genetics (145 citations) and Aging (21 citations). Michael Lenz has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Theodore A. Evans, Martin Zenke, Andreas Schuppert, Christine A. Nalepa, Frank Müller, Joseph C. S. Lai, Chow‐Yang Lee, Wolfgang Wagner, Bernd Denecke and Michael J. Lacey. Their work appears in journals such as Insectes Sociaux, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Bulletin of Entomological Research and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact